<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Security in an Unsecure World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ryanshooltz.info/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ryanshooltz.info</link>
	<description>ryan shooltz</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 01:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Any Vendor Strategy, why not? by Louis Gray (BlueArc)</title>
		<link>http://ryanshooltz.info/archives/82#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Gray (BlueArc)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Given that many server and storage vendors have pushed toward commodity hardware and standard software, it becomes difficult to find differentiation that drives the need for a homogeneous environment. Instead, customers may buy that system or solution that has the best price of the day.

For differentiated equipment that offers customers a unique business proposition, it makes sense to have a tiered infrastructure, either through a single vendor with multiple product lines, or multiple vendors, deploying each to their specialty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that many server and storage vendors have pushed toward commodity hardware and standard software, it becomes difficult to find differentiation that drives the need for a homogeneous environment. Instead, customers may buy that system or solution that has the best price of the day.</p>
<p>For differentiated equipment that offers customers a unique business proposition, it makes sense to have a tiered infrastructure, either through a single vendor with multiple product lines, or multiple vendors, deploying each to their specialty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
